31st August 2010
|
|
Arp Constable
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USofA
Posts: 1,547
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oko
I can not think of the single serious advantage of FreeBSD over OpenBSD for a typical desktop user.
|
Pro FreeBSD: - Programs in ports tend to be updated more frequently (in the majority of cases) than OpenBSD packages, in my experience. (I mean between OS releases)
- Linux emulation is maintained, and a much higher priority than OpenBSDs.
- A number of linux binaries avail for quick via ports, e.g. opera, flash, teamspeak2, etc. Useful when there isn't access to the apps source code.
- For what use WINE is on BSD, it's probably the best on FreeBSD. Which ain't much use off Linux IMHO.
- Official'ish nVidia drivers, FWIW.
- Longer term of support for most releases than OpenBSD. (Security patches, errata, etc getting backported)
- FreeBSD /bin/sh is better for testing portability of shell scripts than OpenBSDs (pd)ksh based implementation
- More developers / eye balls
Pro OpenBSD: - Easier to update base system
- Easier to update installed software
- It doesn't get easier to install than OpenBSD (IMHO)
- First to see improvements to PF
- Steady and dependable support cycle.
- Binary packages are much more reliable than FreeBSD, and generally preferred over ports! (FreeBSD is more of a source based distribution)
- Awesome version of ksh, that removes the need to install something else (bash, zsh, etc).
- The FAQ is golden. Read it, memorize it, redirect others to it.
- The system tends to be more compact
- Most interesting C library extensions and network drivers, tend to be ported from OpenBSD to FreeBSD/Linux; not so much the inverse.
If I keep going on OpenBSD, I'll hit the maximum size limits for posts, so I'll just say that I like that OS a lot .
__________________
My Journal
Thou shalt check the array bounds of all strings (indeed, all arrays), for surely where thou typest ``foo'' someone someday shall type ``supercalifragilisticexpialidocious''.
|