Quote:
Originally Posted by Oko
P.S. By the way the fundamental problem with Debian/kFreeBSD is licensing as FreeBSD kernel can not be relicensed to GPL even by an infinite stretch of imagination. That is way the project (Debian/kFreeBSD) was dormant for many, many years.
|
Agreed.
Stallman rejected the idea of using the BSD kernel.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wikipedia_GNU-entry
Thomas Bushnell, the initial Hurd architect, said in hindsight that the decision to start a new kernel rather than adapt the BSD work set the project back considerably, and that the project should have used the BSD kernel for this reason.
|
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/stallman-kth.html And search for the word social.
The Debian/kFreeBSD is probably what should have been.
On OpenBSD: It's good and stable. I had to drop it from my B&W G3 because GNOME and orca requirements were more than I had available.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oko
There are definitely many instances in which Linux is more suitable or sometimes the only system that can do the job but apt-get argument is definitely not one of them.
|
Make and configure are much better because the user has more control over the build- my opinion.