View Single Post
  #9   (View Single Post)  
Old 20th February 2010
jggimi's Avatar
jggimi jggimi is offline
More noise than signal
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 7,977
Default

No, it probably isn't wise. It will consume memory to house the rule set, and it will consume CPU to process the rules, even with PF optimization.

Why do your 1000 addresses need to have individualized queues? You should have classes of users that can all share the same queue.

E.g: 500 of your users might have a workload (or everything, which is what you wanted) in a queue that consumes 10% of total bandwidth when there is contention, and borrows up to 50% of the total bandwith from a parent queue (which does not borrow) when there is not.
Reply With Quote