Quote:
Originally Posted by gillindu
Especially since I discovered that wd0a+wd0h+wd0b(swap) sizes do not exactly match the wd0c size! The difference (overlapping) is very small (189 sectors), but, here it is.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gillindu
(Now it would be for 62 sectors and not 126 as before.)
|
127+62=189!
????
Could it be - that! (Although I do not understand exactly - what
) Any comment?