View Single Post
  #5   (View Single Post)  
Old 13th September 2010
Beastie Beastie is offline
Daemonology student
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: /dev/earth0
Posts: 335
Default

I never knew the ~/.local/share thing was a convention hehe. The number of applications following it is so infinitely minuscule. And there is ~/.config too.
I never understood why they did not simply replicate the system's hierarchy, for example ~/etc for the configuration files. I find ~/mnt and ~/bin very useful.

Now, the maintainers could make patches that would replace all $HOME/.appname/config instances with $HOME/.local/share/appname/config or whatever, like they do for other things when they port the application.

This is really a mess, but see the bright side: we have no binary registries that span tens of MBs.
__________________
May the source be with you!
Reply With Quote