View Single Post
  #4   (View Single Post)  
Old 30th October 2008
graudeejs's Avatar
graudeejs graudeejs is offline
Real Name: Aldis Berjoza
ISO Quartermaster
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Riga, Latvia
Posts: 589
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adamk View Post
Well, first of all, QT is already open source.
really?

Quote:
Originally Posted by adamk View Post
And, frankly, you face the same problem with any application or library. What happens with the current gtk maintainers get tired of maintaining it? Someone else will continue the project. And, I'm quite sure, the same will happen with QT. That's the great thing about open source software.
Ye, and one of greatest examples i know is my favorite window manager fvwm


EDIT
from wikipedia:

Compromises were sought between KDE and Trolltech whereby Qt would not be able to fall under a more restrictive license than the QPL, even if Trolltech was bought out or went bankrupt. This led to the creation of the KDE Free Qt foundation, which guarantees that Qt would fall under a BSD-style license should no free software/open source version of Qt be released during 12 months.

Last edited by graudeejs; 30th October 2008 at 02:18 PM.
Reply With Quote