@oko
>OpenBSD supports SMP on i386
To show all of the cpus in dmesg doesn't count. It's lightyears behind FreeBSD, even NetBSD is more advanced. It's performance I'm talking of. But in the end they don't care about it, because security is important. And if you want anything ultra-secure, then you have to live with massive sacrifices.
Another example: 10Gb on OpenBSD,
http://www.openbsd.org/papers/cuug2007/mgp00008.html
What's better? 'Hey we can do it' or 'Hey we are using some of it benefits'?