View Single Post
  #2   (View Single Post)  
Old 24th September 2015
jggimi's Avatar
jggimi jggimi is offline
More noise than signal
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 7,977
Default

Welcome back!

I'm going to guess that it is your use of the egress group in your nat-to rule. If the carp(4) interface is not part of the egress group, then this rule will not apply. And, normally, carp(4) interfaces are part of the carp group.

It's just a guess, of course.

----

Edited to add: the egress group is assigned to interfaces that use the default route. So if this is the problem, you may have a routing issue via the carp(4) interface.

Last edited by jggimi; 25th September 2015 at 02:08 AM.
Reply With Quote