Quote:
Originally Posted by kienjakenobi
Key:
Title – Number of required posts (First derivative of posts) (Second derivative of posts)
Set 1:
Third derivative of 6
New User - 0
Port Guard – 20 (20)
Fdisk Soldier – 46 (26) (6)
Shell Scout – 84 (38) (12)
Package Pilot – 140 (56) (18)
Spam Deminer – 220 (80) (24)
VPN Cryptographer – 330 (110) (30)
ISO Quartermaster – 476 (146) (36)
Fsck Surgeon – 664 (188) (42)
Rc.conf Instructor - 900 (236) (48)
----
Set 2:
Third derivative of 9
Arp Constable – 1193 (293) (57)
Regex Recruiter – 1552 (359) (66)
Tcpdump Spy – 1986 (434) (75)
Syslog Inspector – 2504 (518) (84)
Disklabel Sergeant – 3115 (611) (93)
Firewall Lieutenant – 3828 (713) (102)
Kernel Captain – 4652 (824) (111)
Netstat Major – 5596 (944) (120)
Ifconfig Colonel – 6669 (1073) (129)
Routing General – 7880 (1211) (138)
Module Marshal – 9238 (1358) (147)
Xterm Admiral – 10752 (1514) (156)
----
Set 3:
Third derivative of 12
Filesystem Commander – 12434 (1682) (168)
Inetd Intendant – 14296 (1862) (180)
Grep Wizard – 16350 (2054) (192)
Chief of Disks – 18605 (2255) (204)
Chief of Daemons – 21076 (2471) (216)
|
1 more vote from me. I love those name conventions <3
However, post count doesnt indicate how competent user is. Maybe he asks too much, he loves spamming or simply he is very active. The more accurate way to assess is the number of times he is thanked. But at the end of the day, ranking is just spice of the main course, I'd rather spend more time to improve the forum content. The success of the forum depends upon how good the content is.