View Single Post
  #2   (View Single Post)  
Old 24th July 2009
TerryP's Avatar
TerryP TerryP is offline
Arp Constable
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USofA
Posts: 1,547
Default

I don't have them running on the same machine at the moment, so I can't run a proper test, but like many programs clamscan should understand '-' as scanning its standard input.

I tried using cat and head as a test on my OpenBSD machine:

Code:
& pi 1 cat
 ... output for message number 1 ...
&  pi 1 head -n 3
Referencing before 1
& pi 1 /tmp/filterscript
 ... top 3 lines of message number 1 ...
The test was done using the mailx util on an OpenBSD 4.4-release box. Perhaps nailx/heirloom mailx may be different (or I'm just being stupid) but it seems to have an issue about executing a command > 1 word. If needed you can always create a filter script to supply any needed arguments to clamscan.
__________________
My Journal

Thou shalt check the array bounds of all strings (indeed, all arrays), for surely where thou typest ``foo'' someone someday shall type ``supercalifragilisticexpialidocious''.
Reply With Quote