View Single Post
  #2   (View Single Post)  
Old 28th September 2016
e1-531g e1-531g is offline
ISO Quartermaster
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 628
Default

There are some concerns about license of LLVM in future.
Some people in upstream LLVM community want change license to Apache 2 with explicit GPLv2 compatibility.

http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=147500019026245&w=2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ingo Schwarze
Hi Benjamin,

kbenjamin Coplon wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 01:23:43PM -0400:

> What does the OpenBSD community think about the LLVM proposal to move
> to the Apache license?
>
> http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm...er/104778.html

If LLVM would move to the Apache 2 license, we would become unable
to use versions released after that change, and would be stuck with
version released before the change, just like we are stuck with
pre-GPLv3 gcc now. So it would be very bad for us.

See http://www.openbsd.org/policy.html :

Apache
The original Apache license was similar to the Berkeley license,
but source code published under version 2 of the Apache license
is subject to additional restrictions and cannot be included
into OpenBSD.

In a nutshell, OpenBSD does not consider software released under
Apache 2 to be free software. At least not free enough for us.

Yours,
Ingo
__________________
Signature: Furthermore, I consider that systemd must be destroyed.
Based on Latin oratorical phrase

Last edited by e1-531g; 28th September 2016 at 11:55 AM.
Reply With Quote