I really don't agree with you,
harishankar.
I think you don't really understand the open-source philosophy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by harishankar
I would really wish BSD folks had and maintained their own full-featured X desktop environment(...)
|
I don't see why, with BSDs, you can choose your desktop : Gnome, Kde, Lxde, Xfce, FluxBox, etc...
I don't see the need for a specific Desktop, there is a lot of choice, and this what I love with BSDs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by harishankar
> I also wish that peripheral hardware support (...) etc. improves in BSD.(...)
|
Well, perhaps you don't know, but this is one of the most important part of Theo De Raadt's job !
Drivers can be quickly developed
only if the manufacturer shares hardware drivers, and Theo is really doing a wonderful job in this way...
Quote:
Originally Posted by harishankar
Also a larger collection of software that's written by BSD folk for the BSDs.
|
The best softwares are the open-source softwares, written for everybody, not a specific OS.
Quote:
Originally Posted by harishankar
I agree that a lot of this is due to lack of manpower, but I suspect it's also due to lack of interest in getting the BSDs on desktops.(...)
|
And I think you've got a bad idea of the BSDs philosophy.
If you want an OS with the last softwares, the last drivers, etc..., then you're don't need a BSD, but a Linux/Windows/OS X distribution.
The BSD's developers philosophy is more like :
Quote:
We made a lot of efforts for you, and you're big enough to learn.
So if you don't find what you need, then you'll have to make efforts to obtain it, compiling it yourself if necessary.
|