Thanks very much Jgimmi !!
I bet the intersectional sphere is the outcome of the OpenBSD Team's strife to put coding parameters back on track .. so .. reliability is code correctness and security is system-wide correctness and both make up what might be technically labelled {a mature & stable OS} .. I am right here ? am I right to say that Tanenbaum diapproves of linux kernel because of this very issue ? code correctness .. while praising NetBSD .. the more one tries to patch and fix issues the more it gets worse until it reaches windows-like cases .. underneath .. I remember he used the word spaghetti .. as analogy ..
In what way am I wrong to characterize MacOsX (for instance) as a {reliabe+insecure} OS ?
Last edited by daemonfowl; 27th March 2012 at 08:36 PM.
|