Force traffic over interface instead of loopback
I have setup an OpenBSD box with two nics (10.50.0.100 and 10.50.0.101).
I would like to send traffic between these interfaces, but would like to force the traffic over the wire and not over the loopback interface.
Any ideas on how this could be accomplished?
As a concept, I understand why you would want to test your NICs in this manner. With a cross-over cable there are no external devices that might inadvertantly skew performance results.
However... even if you could get a functional test, your results will not match any real network load. And, unles your test is able to peak CPU 0 at 100% load you will be unable to isolate the component that limits performance. (With this OS, the network stack is in-kernal and runs only on CPU 0.) And on OpenBSD, there's no way to set affinity to other CPUs for your tcpbench processes.
I believe you should test with at least three systems: the client, the server, and the system under test.
When benchmarking network performance, you should model your actual network. I will refer you to a recent discussion thread on the misc@ mailing list about 10Gbit Ethernet benchmarks. The discussion thread began here. You might find it helpful.
Two NICs on one subnet
You need to be very careful if you do this. As I mentioned above, I never recommend it. If you search (perhaps with Google) using the search terms two nics one subnet, you will find many recommendations to avoid this. You can have problems with ARP resolution and routing on the subnet. I will refer you to the first hit on Google with those search terms in that order, a brief white paper from National Instruments which may be helpful: Best Practices for Using Multiple Network Interfaces (NICs) with NI Products
Loopback routing via two NICs
Even if you are able to correctly configure two Ethernet NICs on one subnet, you cannot use a single layer 2 IP subnet in the manner you intend, due to how subnets on IP are defined and routed.
You might be able to establish and use a point-to-point tunnel on separate subnets, using chmod(2) or chmod(2), but then you would be testing the tunnel protocol's performance over Ethernet, rather than Ethernet, and you would still not be sure you were connecting via chmod(2) or your NICs without further analysis.
Last edited by jggimi; 27th August 2013 at 12:38 AM. Reason: typos, clarity
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Brute force attacks||Dr-D||OpenBSD Security||1||18th July 2011 04:06 PM|
|ssh brute force attacks||sniper007||FreeBSD Security||21||12th June 2011 01:28 AM|
|Re: TCP acknowledgments on loopback interface||nilsgecko||OpenBSD General||0||24th May 2011 06:07 AM|
|pf.conf brute force rule||ijk||FreeBSD Security||6||11th August 2008 04:54 PM|