DaemonForums  

Go Back   DaemonForums > FreeBSD > FreeBSD Ports and Packages

FreeBSD Ports and Packages Installation and upgrading of ports and packages on FreeBSD.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   (View Single Post)  
Old 26th November 2009
Oliver_H's Avatar
Oliver_H Oliver_H is offline
Real Name: Oliver Herold
UNIX lover
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 429
Thanked 26 Times in 22 Posts
Default FYI: TeXlive 2009 binaries for FreeBSD 6,7,8 i386/AMD64

Quote:
Dear TeXLive team,

I created 6 sets of FreeBSD binaries of TeXLive2009, for FreeBSD 6, 7
and 8, each for i386 and amd64:

http://anthesphoria.net/FreeBSD/TeXLive-2009/bin/

As an active FreeBSD contributor/porter -- and a user of TeXLive on
FreeBSD myself -- I offer to maintain all these sets and do test builds
from now on. This maintenance might include producing new sets of
binaries if significant changes occur in software provided by ports
system that TL binaries are linked to.

Besides, I will be glad to cover more FreeBSD versions for these two
archs if a need arises, although this in unlikely at the moment.

I am aware that you received offers for FreeBSD maintainership earlier,
but I hope that my offer will suit you better because of "all-in-one"
approach.
http://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/20...er/023783.html


FYI :-)
__________________
use UNIX or die :-)
Reply With Quote
  #2   (View Single Post)  
Old 27th November 2009
Oko's Avatar
Oko Oko is offline
Fsck Surgeon
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kosovo, Serbia
Posts: 842
Thanked 36 Times in 32 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver_H View Post
Hiroki Sato's "work" on porting TeXLive to FreeBSD has done more damage to FreeBSD desktop user base than anything since the project inception 1993 including the lack of native Flash
plug-in.

The Romaine Tartiere's and Nikola Lekic's work in bringing TeXLive to FreeBSD is admirable but I feel that at this point FreeBSD foundation will have to get involved to preserve credibility of FreeBSD. FreeBSD should remove any developer privileges that Hiroki has and set an example for "developers" like him. Otherwise they might as well start advocating use of OS X as a desktop system (practice widely spread among FreeBSD and some NetBSD developers) and focus on a very few server applications that they still do rather well.

Last edited by Oko; 27th November 2009 at 03:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3   (View Single Post)  
Old 27th November 2009
TerryP's Avatar
TerryP TerryP is offline
Arp Constable
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USofA
Posts: 1,547
Thanked 112 Times in 104 Posts
Default

Hmm, maybe DocBook won't have to replace *all* my uses of LaTeX....
__________________
My Journal

Thou shalt check the array bounds of all strings (indeed, all arrays), for surely where thou typest ``foo'' someone someday shall type ``supercalifragilisticexpialidocious''.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
i386 to amd64 gkontos FreeBSD Installation and Upgrading 3 10th November 2009 02:49 PM
FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (amd64 & i386) VMware Virtual Appliances Available glarkin_at_FreeBSD FreeBSD Installation and Upgrading 1 3rd December 2008 08:49 AM
i386 drivers on amd64 kienjakenobi FreeBSD Ports and Packages 5 25th June 2008 05:37 PM
i386 6.x binaries not working on AMD64 7.x (with compat) lesmando24 FreeBSD General 5 29th May 2008 05:39 AM
Revert from AMD64 to i386 chavez243 FreeBSD General 6 6th May 2008 12:24 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content copyright © 2007-2010, the authors
Daemon image copyright ©1988, Marshall Kirk McKusick