DaemonForums  

Go Back   DaemonForums > Other Operating Systems > Other BSD and UNIX/UNIX-like

Other BSD and UNIX/UNIX-like Any other flavour of BSD or UNIX that does not have a section of its own.

View Poll Results: what linux distro do you use and/or like?
Redhat / Centos 23 18.70%
Suse 2 1.63%
Debian 26 21.14%
Slackware 22 17.89%
Gentoo 11 8.94%
Ubuntu 20 16.26%
Others 19 15.45%
Voters: 123. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14th April 2009
Oliver_H's Avatar
Oliver_H Oliver_H is offline
Real Name: Oliver Herold
UNIX lover
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 429
Thanked 26 Times in 22 Posts
Default

@carpetsmoker, well you could try too g4u, http://fehu.org/~feyrer/g4u/
__________________
use UNIX or die :-)
Reply With Quote
Old 14th April 2009
Carpetsmoker's Avatar
Carpetsmoker Carpetsmoker is offline
Real Name: Martin
Old man from scene 24
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Eindhoven, Netherlands
Posts: 2,062
Thanked 198 Times in 156 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver_H View Post
@carpetsmoker, well you could try too g4u, http://fehu.org/~feyrer/g4u/
It's not the same, Norton Ghost reads NTFS filesystems and copies stuff file-by-file, ghost4unix copies sector-by-sector (like dd) and is much slower.
It also can't do things like resizing the filesystem or skipping files....
__________________
UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things.
Reply With Quote
Old 14th April 2009
jggimi's Avatar
jggimi jggimi is offline
More noise than signal
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,610
Thanked 214 Times in 189 Posts
Default

It's not *like* dd, it *is* dd.
Reply With Quote
Old 14th April 2009
Oliver_H's Avatar
Oliver_H Oliver_H is offline
Real Name: Oliver Herold
UNIX lover
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 429
Thanked 26 Times in 22 Posts
Default

>file-by-file

Well yes, I see this as a disadvantage. But performance-wise it's sometimes PITA.
__________________
use UNIX or die :-)
Reply With Quote
Old 21st April 2009
wubrgamer's Avatar
wubrgamer wubrgamer is offline
Port Guard
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 34
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stukov View Post
All desktop computers at work run Ubuntu. This is why I also use it as a Desktop. It just works. However, I haven't tried that much Linux distributions. For other needs, I run *BSDs.
where do you work?
Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2009
evilunixuser evilunixuser is offline
Real Name: stan broniszewski
Port Guard
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: new jersey, usa
Posts: 12
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

My system runs Windows XP, Mepis (a Debian based), and Dragonfly BSD.
Reply With Quote
Old 5th December 2010
fbsduser fbsduser is offline
Shell Scout
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 103
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Primary: Hackintosh 10.6 64bits/Linux from scratch 32bits.
Testbox: (currently) minix 3.
Reply With Quote
Old 5th December 2010
drhowarddrfine drhowarddrfine is offline
VPN Cryptographer
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 358
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Default

How many years must this thread drag on? The other forum has a similar one that's been 2 years running.
Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2010
Carpetsmoker's Avatar
Carpetsmoker Carpetsmoker is offline
Real Name: Martin
Old man from scene 24
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Eindhoven, Netherlands
Posts: 2,062
Thanked 198 Times in 156 Posts
Default

Fedora Core 4 and 13 at work.

Took some getting used to, for example I set some stuff with the setsebool command, I then searched for some config file in /etc/ to make the change permanent. Apparently the changes are saved "automagically" ... The same applies to many other commands.
It certainly does things in a very different way once you dig a bit deeper ...

Other than that, the general "desktop" experience (Which is tcsh/vim/tmux/grep/etc.) is pretty much the same ...
__________________
UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things.
Reply With Quote
Old 5th June 2014
bsd-keith bsd-keith is offline
Real Name: Keith
FreeBSD (+GhostBSD)
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Surrey/Hants Border, England
Posts: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Linux distros that I use are AntiX & SliTaz.
__________________
Linux since 1999, occasional BSD user.
Reply With Quote
Old 1 Week Ago
fn8t fn8t is offline
New User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 7
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I don't use Linux anymore. If I did it would be LFS, Draco, or LSD Linux. All of them work with pkgsrc and can be setup or come stock without systemd. LSD (less systemd) comes in a KDE version and a Base version. I'd use the Base.
Reply With Quote
Old 19 Hours Ago
cynwulf cynwulf is offline
Port Guard
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 26
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Used to use Debian and have been a Slackware user until recently.

The former went with systemd, the latter is still one of the few saner Linux distributions out there and is the only Linux distro I would recommend to others.

Debian's decision to go with systemd just confirmed my own suspicions that Red Hat have too much influence over the GNU/Linux eco system - and of course Canonical have too much influence over the Debian project itself. Despite developing their own init system, they were quick to also switch to systemd as soon as Debian made the announcement.

The wider problem with GNU/Linux is that it's not just about free software and GNU anymore. That seems to have gone out of fashion. Corporations now play a much bigger role.

It's interesting that the GPL licenses were supposed to be about freeing software entirely. But instead we've seen corporations simply owning or influencing the people and the projects themselves in order to control and manipulate the GPL software - (if they can't own it and close it off, then they steer it in whichever direction which suits them). systemd is just one example of a corporate backed putsch which is pretty much infesting everything.

The BSD licenses. which have been criticised by some for being too permissive, at least allows the big corporations to take what they want and leave the FOSS projects alone (unless they want to throw some money their way or donate some hardware, etc).
Reply With Quote
Old 5 Hours Ago
Oko's Avatar
Oko Oko is offline
Fsck Surgeon
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kosovo, Serbia
Posts: 761
Thanked 36 Times in 32 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cynwulf View Post
Debian's decision to go with systemd just confirmed my own suspicions that Red Hat have too much influence over the GNU/Linux eco system - and of course Canonical have too much influence over the Debian project itself. Despite developing their own init system, they were quick to also switch to systemd as soon as Debian made the announcement.
etc).
When somebody contributes 85% of entire Linux kernel (like Red Hat) it seems very natural to call the shoots. The second largest contributor to Linux kernel is SUSE with more than 10%. Due to Debian's negligible contribution just like Canonical to Linux kernel it seems natural that they follow the leader. At least Canonical is footing the bill for Gnome. Debian is truly a hobby project and probably the largest contribution is that OpenSSL bug which they introduced couple of years ago to avoid compilation warrnings.


Quote:
Originally Posted by cynwulf View Post
The BSD licenses. which have been criticised by some for being too permissive, at least allows the big corporations to take what they want and leave the FOSS projects alone (unless they want to throw some money their way or donate some hardware, etc).
You do not philosophically understand BSD licensing model which came out of academi and internal organization of BSDs at least until 1993.
Reply With Quote
Old 3 Minutes Ago
cynwulf cynwulf is offline
Port Guard
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 26
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oko View Post
When somebody contributes 85% of entire Linux kernel (like Red Hat)
Where did you get "85%"?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oko View Post
You do not philosophically understand BSD licensing model which came out of academi and internal organization of BSDs at least until 1993.
And what makes you say that based on what I posted? I only said that the BSD licenses were more "permissive" in that they are not copyleft, not as a any kind of criticism, just stating fact. I don't think that you should assume that you know what others understand / or not based on only a few forum posts...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Adding apps to an obscure OpenBSD based distro insomniadmx OpenBSD Packages and Ports 4 14th April 2009 12:10 PM
linux compat and linux-only drivers fbsduser FreeBSD General 9 22nd January 2009 05:42 PM
Own FreeBSD Distro anritsu FreeBSD Ports and Packages 10 7th October 2008 03:02 PM
linux-firefox 3 cmcgoat FreeBSD Ports and Packages 1 8th September 2008 07:06 PM
Linux Kernel map TerryP Other BSD and UNIX/UNIX-like 2 1st July 2008 05:33 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content copyright © 2007-2010, the authors
Daemon image copyright ©1988, Marshall Kirk McKusick