DaemonForums  

Go Back   DaemonForums > OpenBSD > OpenBSD General

OpenBSD General Other questions regarding OpenBSD which do not fit in any of the categories below.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   (View Single Post)  
Old 10th October 2017
bsd007's Avatar
bsd007 bsd007 is offline
Always learning
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 242
Default sysctl kern.version confusion

When running snapshot

Quote:
Originally Posted by bsd007 View Post
Code:
$ sysctl kern.version
kern.version=OpenBSD 6.2 (GENERIC.MP) #134: Tue Oct  3 21:22:29 MDT 2017
    deraadt@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
Now that command shows this

Code:
$ sysctl kern.version
kern.version=OpenBSD 6.2 (GENERIC.MP) #134: Tue Oct  3 21:22:29 MDT 2017
    deraadt@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
Absolutely the same. Is that okay ?
Reply With Quote
  #2   (View Single Post)  
Old 10th October 2017
jggimi's Avatar
jggimi jggimi is online now
More noise than signal
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 7,983
Default

It's the same kernel. There is a significant effort in release engineering, which is typically 1-3 days of work, so it is likely there are differences in the userland environment.
Reply With Quote
  #3   (View Single Post)  
Old 10th October 2017
gustaf gustaf is offline
Fdisk Soldier
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 69
Default

Thanks bsd007 and jggimi for answering the question I was just about to post.

I ran $ sysctl kern.version earlier this evening trying to troubleshoot a possible snapshot-to-snapshot upgrade problem.

My output was exactly the same as bsd007's, even though I upgraded yesterday. I was wondering if I somehow downgraded from -current to -release.

It's good to know that's not the case and thanks for helping me learn something new.

I always thought the date reflected any changes in either the kernel or userland
Reply With Quote
  #4   (View Single Post)  
Old 10th October 2017
jggimi's Avatar
jggimi jggimi is online now
More noise than signal
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 7,983
Default

The release(8) man page describes the build process. Kernel, userland, and Xenocara are three separate build steps. When you build a release (of any flavor), there are two additional procedural steps.

I'm not a Project member (developer), all I know of the release engineering phase is that it is a significant amount of work because I can see a lot of it in the ChangeLogs. I recall Theo has described it as "simpler" now that CDs are no longer being pressed.
Reply With Quote
  #5   (View Single Post)  
Old 10th October 2017
bsd007's Avatar
bsd007 bsd007 is offline
Always learning
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 242
Default

@jggimi

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OpenBSD kern.usermount removed for OpenBSD 6.0 jggimi News 1 15th July 2016 03:47 PM
sysctl: third level name kern.emul.linux in kern.emul is invalid daemonfowl OpenBSD General 6 7th October 2013 04:22 PM
kern.ipc.maxpipekva exceeded chavez243 FreeBSD General 2 20th August 2008 01:02 PM
kern.ipc.maxpipekva exceeded schrodinger FreeBSD General 4 22nd July 2008 01:29 PM
kern.version string in -stable? spiderpig OpenBSD General 1 4th June 2008 01:21 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content copyright © 2007-2010, the authors
Daemon image copyright ©1988, Marshall Kirk McKusick