|
OpenBSD Installation and Upgrading Installing and upgrading OpenBSD. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
1. There are no guarantees that forced multi-threading your build will function correctly. The only supported procedure can be found in the release(8) man page.
2. Either you are not looking at the most recent dmesg(8) in the buffer, which wraps, or you are not using the kernel you believe to have been built and installed. You can confirm the latter by inspecting the date and time stamp of the kernel file, then inspecting the contents with strings(1) and grep(1). |
|
||||
Quote:
Here it is: http://daemonforums.org/showthread.p...5428#post65428 Thanks! |
|
|||
Yes you're fine running make -j<whatever>.
|
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
||||
It's pretty simple. If it works, great! If it doesn't, it is not explicitly supported, so rerun your build without it, per release(8).
Parallel build is not discussed in /usr/share/mk/bsd.README, nor is "-j" used in any of the /usr/share/mk/*.mk files. |
|
||||
From the perspective of epistemological methodology and the sociotechnical infrastructure to support it, I don't think a shallow trial would be sufficient here. What if something is done out of order in a way that doesn't stop the build but does corrupt some part of the system? (This is just armchair chat while I wait for a ports compile to complete). Two common approaches to answer such a question are to reason from the design or to extensively test the implemented system. (This reminds me, the Make with Ada registration is open through Oct 16, 2018 – Feb 15, 2019). Is there a comprehensive test suite? What's going to happen to these large FOSS projects like OpenBSD when the people who understand those subtle, undocumented and unstated design requirements and specifications are gone?
|
|
|||
We're not going anywhere, don't worry!
|
|
|||
No, I mean that from an institutional knowledge perspective.
|
|
||||
It's probably still fairly common for much knowledge to be maintained entirely in some kind of organic information system - in the minds of its members - and to be primarily transmitted through various customs, traditions, rights and rituals. Being so subjective and implicit rather than objective and explicit, that seems better classified as community culture than institutional knowledge. I suppose one simple way to begin to distinguish the two is to examine what information has been encoded into explicit, objective records.
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Building a 10.2 system from source | hanzer | FreeBSD Installation and Upgrading | 1 | 1st September 2015 01:36 AM |
Building OpenBSD userland from source | bceverly | OpenBSD General | 6 | 6th April 2015 07:26 PM |
*** Error code 1 building OpenBSD 5.1-stable from source | comet--berkeley | OpenBSD Installation and Upgrading | 12 | 19th May 2012 02:18 AM |
Blinkenlights for all: Cisco's building automation system vulnerable to manipulation | J65nko | News | 0 | 27th May 2010 04:26 PM |
Building a New System, Ideas | ninjatux | General Hardware | 19 | 20th May 2009 09:54 AM |