DaemonForums  

Go Back   DaemonForums > OpenBSD > OpenBSD General

OpenBSD General Other questions regarding OpenBSD which do not fit in any of the categories below.

View Poll Results: As an OpenBSD admin:
I do not use any RAID on my OpenBSD systems, nor do I plan to. 3 20.00%
I do not use any RAID on my OpenBSD systems, but will use Softraid once root-on-RAID is available. 3 20.00%
My RAID implementations are all BIOS managed, I don't use OpenBSD to manage them. 1 6.67%
I use bioctl(8) to manage hardware RAID subsystems on OpenBSD. 4 26.67%
I use RAIDframe today, waiting for root-on-RAID to make the switch to Softraid. 2 13.33%
I used to use RAIDframe, but switched to Softraid. I don't require root-on-RAID operationally. 1 6.67%
I never used RAIDframe, I'm just a Softraid user. I don't require root-on-RAID operationally. 3 20.00%
None of the above describe my situation. See the thread for why. 0 0%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1   (View Single Post)  
Old 2nd May 2011
jggimi's Avatar
jggimi jggimi is offline
More noise than signal
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 7,983
Default RAIDframe -> Softraid

I don't often ask for OpenBSD administrative advice, I usually provide it...whether or not it is correct advice.

One of my servers uses RAIDframe in a root-on-RAID configuration. I've had bad sectors on one of the drives multiple times, and with RAIDframe have had no unscheduled downtime. I've taken drives out of service, "repaired" bad sectors by having the drive replace them from spare, and placed them back into service, without rebooting. No sector failures in the last 18 months, though.

I use Softraid on my netbook, with the CRYPTO discipline, to encrypt /home at rest. I use it with a DUID so that it mounts regardless of sd # assignment. I like Softraid, it is easier to provision and manage than RAIDframe. But it is not quite yet "production RAID" ready, as root-on-RAID is not yet possible. Altroot provides a method to recover from a failed root drive, but the root drive remains a single point of failure.

That said, root-on-RAID is coming to -current. Soon. I am thinking about becoming an early adopter. As such, I want to know if I'll be in the minority, or among the majority.

An informal poll is attached to this thread, with questions for the community regarding your administration of software RAID implementations. If you administrate any OpenBSD system, even if its just a single workstation for personal use, please respond to the poll, whether or not you use any RAID implementations at all.

I'm also seeking advice from anyone who has gone down the path of softraid for RAID management (as opposed to CRYPTO) already, before root-on-RAID is available.

Thanks!

Edit: You may select multiple choices, if you manage multiple RAID environments.
Edit: please consider storage that is an externally managed RAID subsystem equivalent to BIOS-managed, when responding to the poll.

Last edited by jggimi; 2nd May 2011 at 03:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RAID1 rebuild for softraid bsdplus OpenBSD General 1 19th June 2010 03:17 PM
OpenBSD heads up - softraid metadata change J65nko News 0 26th March 2010 10:27 PM
Rebuilding RAIDframe mirror after crash/power failure sherekhan OpenBSD Installation and Upgrading 7 25th September 2009 10:06 PM
softraid encryption Sunnz OpenBSD Security 6 24th September 2009 04:58 AM
SOFTRAID(4) revzalot OpenBSD Installation and Upgrading 3 27th July 2008 08:40 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content copyright © 2007-2010, the authors
Daemon image copyright ©1988, Marshall Kirk McKusick