|
||||
Archaeologists Unearth Prehistoric Pentium Chip
This stunningly well preserved archaeological find was dug up from the frozen tundra near Tappleytown, Canada. The processor measures about 4.5 feet (1.4 meters) square. Carbon dating tests indicate an origin in the Permian period. The CPU is believed to have once run an operating system called DimetroDOS, a forerunner of CP/M and, in turn, Windows 7. The complete structure is, of course, entirely made of wood. It appears to be an early from of particle-board -- an amalgamation of many wood chips -- leading to speculation the processor may have been highly multi-core in nature. Scientists continue to dig in the area searching for traces of a mainboard. Last edited by IdOp; 26th December 2011 at 08:30 PM. |
|
||||
__________________
religions, worst damnation of mankind "If 386BSD had been available when I started on Linux, Linux would probably never had happened." Linus Torvalds Linux is not UNIX! Face it! It is not an insult. It is fact: GNU is a recursive acronym for “GNU's Not UNIX”. vermaden's: links resources deviantart spreadbsd |
|
|||
just saw dennis richie then talked to myself .. how the herd deplored steve jobs and forgot about that great man
mourning too like praising is dollar-bound is it just because people no longer think in and about c ? maybe the media is the sole cause .. media alzheimer .. but parial alzheimer since apple-man is never let down postmortem and antemortem am I mistaken here ? |
|
|||
loool .. when I opened the link .. I talked to myself :
"aaaaa .. here is your prog lge ! go ahead and forget about c/python/perl ... " maybe CarpetSmoker meant it .. lol .. |
|
|||
|
|
||||
censorship fail ;)
__________________
religions, worst damnation of mankind "If 386BSD had been available when I started on Linux, Linux would probably never had happened." Linus Torvalds Linux is not UNIX! Face it! It is not an insult. It is fact: GNU is a recursive acronym for “GNU's Not UNIX”. vermaden's: links resources deviantart spreadbsd |
|
||||
best table ever ...
__________________
religions, worst damnation of mankind "If 386BSD had been available when I started on Linux, Linux would probably never had happened." Linus Torvalds Linux is not UNIX! Face it! It is not an insult. It is fact: GNU is a recursive acronym for “GNU's Not UNIX”. vermaden's: links resources deviantart spreadbsd |
|
|||
Hi Vermaden !
well I guess I know why you liked the table .. mmm ... because full of orifices which remind hackers like you of an infamous OS .. lol .. or maybe because of those "" .. are they canons or champagne bottles ? .. |
|
|||
http://vistaexperiences.com/wp-conte..._buy_vista.jpg
Ok .. the steve jobs's OS wins here .. but .. what's behind that ? in the end it's the easiest OS to hack into .. (charlie Miller ...) .. lost game .. |
|
|||
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBn8B...eature=related
actually the three sync .. rythm speeds up and performs well .. |
|
|||
Important Programming Truths ..
If it compiles, it works. If it compiles, it's correct. If it runs, it doesn't have any bugs. If it doesn't have any immediately obvious bugs, it's perfect. If a bug doesn't show, it doesn't exist. If it seems to work, it works. Doing something right is easy. Avoiding errors only takes a bit of concentration. The shorter the source code, the faster the program. It's obvious how to optimize a program. Prorammers don't make mistakes. Run-time errors don't occur. Users don't make mistakes. I don't make mistakes. Errors of any kind are rare. Error handling can be done in version 2. It's OK to crash on bad input. It's OK to give incorrect output on bad input. Portability isn't useful. All the world's a VAX. Or, these days, an MS-DOS box The length of the feature list is important. Speed is good, features are better. Slowness can be fixed in hardware. The bigger a program is, the better it is. Random changes to a program fix bugs. Testing takes only a short while. Finding bugs is easy. Fixing bugs is trivial. Bug-fixes don't need to be tested. Trivial changes of any kind don't need to be tested. The first approach, idea, or version is always the best. A 1% crash rate is actually pretty darn good. Code is self-evident. Comments aren't needed. Comments are meant for people other than the original author of the code. Undocumented features are fun and useful. It can always be fixed in the next version. Surprised users are happy users. Demonstrating for clients is the best debugging method. ---- Lars Wirzenius . 1995 .. ^_^ |
|
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Check this out (funny contest). | fbsduser | Off-Topic | 6 | 4th March 2009 10:48 PM |
Funny network behaviour :) | PatrickBaer | General software and network | 5 | 9th October 2008 09:47 AM |
Funny things in /usr/share/misc | ivanatora | FreeBSD General | 4 | 10th August 2008 02:13 PM |