|
||||
Results of the Atom 230 test with OpenBSD 4.6-release, run from DVD. Four runs: i386 GENERIC and GENERIC.MP, amd64 GENERIC and GENERIC.MP. System was an MSI Nettop CS 120.
---- AES-128-CBC test results: GENERIC/i386: 0m33.03s real 0m0.15s user 0m32.88s system GENERIC/amd64: 0m32.63s real 0m0.16s user 0m31.22s system GENERIC.MP/i386: 0m38.30s real 0m0.24s user 0m42.72s system GENERIC.MP/amd64: 0m36.83s real 0m0.18s user 0m55.59s system --- Speed tests: GENERIC/i386: Single thread: type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes aes-128 cbc 17317.63k 23456.74k 25811.60k 26466.83k 26674.35k aes-192 cbc 18362.10k 21216.40k 22134.56k 22374.91k 22453.16k aes-256 cbc 16240.72k 18315.06k 18963.82k 19131.11k 19184.52k 0m45.16s real 0m45.16s user 0m0.01s system Two threads: aes-128 cbc 17714.79k 23221.00k 27120.74k 26564.21k 26759.21k aes-192 cbc 15776.52k 21328.78k 22225.61k 23043.40k 23035.30k aes-256 cbc 14384.94k 17823.54k 18801.63k 19762.17k 20537.14k 0m46.72s real 0m0.00s user 0m0.02s system Three threads: aes-128 cbc 18225.82k 24305.35k 26110.21k 27701.08k 28024.31k aes-192 cbc 16441.85k 20511.97k 24199.37k 22421.39k 24758.83k aes-256 cbc 14782.53k 17067.67k 21000.85k 19236.29k 25083.94k 0m49.43s real 0m0.00s user 0m0.01s system Speed tests, GENERIC/amd64: Single thread: type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes aes-128 cbc 24569.91k 25881.69k 26332.96k 26433.49k 26478.39k aes-192 cbc 21581.97k 22555.53k 22896.95k 22973.32k 23005.64k aes-256 cbc 19218.09k 19851.84k 20082.22k 20132.32k 20156.13k 0m46.97s real 0m45.16s user 0m0.01s system Two threads: aes-128 cbc 24014.08k 25281.38k 26507.32k 25506.59k 26597.55k aes-192 cbc 21102.26k 22481.65k 23027.89k 22173.20k 23405.72k aes-256 cbc 19292.13k 19624.55k 19777.68k 19492.18k 20729.95k 0m49.10s real 0m0.00s user 0m0.01s system Three threads: aes-128 cbc 24328.04k 26362.74k 24147.96k 27477.42k 25787.29k aes-192 cbc 21891.30k 22619.40k 23677.69k 24659.34k 23848.09k aes-256 cbc 20517.89k 20372.90k 19690.39k 21440.61k 20345.06k 0m51.06s real 0m0.01s user 0m0.01s system Speed tests, GENERIC.MP/i386: Single thread: type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes aes-128 cbc 17327.94k 23419.97k 25809.48k 26470.91k 26668.91k aes-192 cbc 15489.57k 20133.40k 21829.74k 22298.03k 22439.55k aes-256 cbc 13953.82k 17501.75k 18736.31k 19071.91k 19170.91k 0m45.16s real 0m45.16s user 0m0.01s system Two threads: aes-128 cbc 26237.44k 39428.80k 45231.50k 47008.23k 47461.38k aes-192 cbc 23856.65k 34225.92k 38472.83k 39778.68k 40128.60k aes-256 cbc 21836.31k 30005.07k 33158.67k 34057.40k 34292.94k 0m45.17s real 0m0.01s user 0m0.02s system Three threads: aes-128 cbc 26303.78k 39456.35k 45830.41k 46789.49k 48217.55k aes-192 cbc 23544.82k 34405.96k 39304.44k 39853.55k 39706.29k aes-256 cbc 22178.44k 30041.12k 33149.84k 34040.33k 35413.99k 0m45.82s real 0m0.00s user 0m0.02s system Speed tests, GENERIC.MP/amd64 Single thread: type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes aes-128 cbc 24534.68k 25887.43k 26337.04k 26450.84k 26483.84k aes-192 cbc 21585.27k 22561.17k 22900.77k 22987.27k 23011.08k aes-256 cbc 19220.91k 19856.14k 20082.48k 20137.08k 20153.41k 0m46.97s real 0m45.15s user 0m0.02s system Two threads: aes-128 cbc 36127.92k 37893.99k 38571.89k 38706.10k 38747.47k aes-192 cbc 31828.11k 33192.90k 33717.79k 33831.38k 33836.92k aes-256 cbc 28374.50k 29361.26k 29668.49k 29763.26k 29780.70k 0m46.98s real 0m0.00s user 0m0.02s system Three threads: aes-128 cbc 35974.69k 37325.56k 38508.54k 38350.03k 38759.72k aes-192 cbc 31815.56k 33203.59k 33718.86k 33823.87k 33950.77k aes-256 cbc 28432.75k 29196.86k 29655.02k 29736.17k 34759.10k 0m48.01s real 0m0.00s user 0m0.03s system |
|
|||
Moving thread to security subforum.
|
|
||||
Power stats for my machine:
http://mrtg.coloclue.net/power-watt/...-4a_kwh_5.html Average is at about 30W, this is for the Atom 330. The Atom 330 has a TDP of 8W, the 230 a TDP of 4W. So most of the power isn't even going to the CPU but to other parts (Disks, chipset, etc.).
__________________
UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things. |
|
||||
Well I ordered the Supermicro system today with a 32GB Patriot Warp SSD drive. I'm eager to try the drive out. I'm hoping the lack if information I see online regarding OpenBSD and SSD's means there have been no troubles. Any benchmark on this you want me to run Scott?
__________________
Mike |
|
||||
Well ... I run my openBSD pf+openVPN machines on compact flash (CF), using UDMA mode-4 compatible CF cards (TRANSCEND 266x).
Is that a P-ATA or S-ATA SSD? I will muse on a test. Suggestions welcome And thanks, mikesg, for offering! /S
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. They will bring you down to their level and beat you with experience. |
|
||||
SATA. This one specifically.
__________________
Mike |
|
||||
Stripped out all the work bits and just included the finished times. I added one more test on the end to work HyperThreading in with the cores.
Code:
OS: OpenBSD 4.6 GENERIC.MP#89 i386 CPU: Intel Atom 330 (1.6 dual core w/ HT enabled) Mem: 2 x 512MB DDR2 PC2-5300 (Kingston) HDD: Patriot WARP SSD PE32GS25SSDR SYS: SUPERMICRO SYS-5015A-H # time openssl dhparam -out 4096.pem 4096 80m29.05s real 80m52.94s user 0m0.36s system # time dd if=/dev/urandom bs=4k count=1024 | openssl enc -e -k 1234 -aes-128-cbc -out /dev/null 0m39.39s real 0m0.13s user 0m45.12s system # time openssl speed aes type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes aes-128 cbc 20985.30k 24882.07k 26168.64k 26508.33k 26617.20k aes-192 cbc 18314.52k 21156.30k 22078.68k 22317.76k 22393.28k aes-256 cbc 16199.47k 18267.73k 18918.40k 19085.18k 19138.25k 0m44.94s real 0m45.16s user 0m0.01s system # time openssl speed -multi 2 aes aes-128 cbc 26225.23k 39334.38k 45187.77k 46969.94k 47490.85k aes-192 cbc 23632.97k 34036.18k 38318.28k 39741.20k 40102.95k aes-256 cbc 27395.71k 32280.03k 33875.69k 34303.54k 34409.66k 0m44.95s real 0m0.00s user 0m0.03s system # time openssl speed -multi 3 aes aes-128 cbc 43699.74k 62988.33k 71228.82k 73662.79k 74406.66k aes-192 cbc 39212.64k 54320.04k 60330.22k 62237.25k 62745.23k aes-256 cbc 43783.70k 50771.32k 52989.85k 53504.35k 53738.76k 0m44.96s real 0m0.01s user 0m0.02s system # time openssl speed -multi 4 aes aes-128 cbc 52515.85k 79062.82k 90566.99k 94105.46k 95207.86k aes-192 cbc 47572.55k 68371.82k 77070.50k 79615.79k 80437.42k aes-256 cbc 43600.37k 59881.42k 66617.64k 68458.31k 68853.80k 0m44.96s real 0m0.01s user 0m0.02s system Code:
load averages: 2.34, 1.13, 0.65 15:27:49 33 processes: 1 running, 28 idle, 4 on processor CPU0 states: 100% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle CPU1 states: 100% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle CPU2 states: 100% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle CPU3 states: 100% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle Memory: Real: 11M/56M act/tot Free: 936M Swap: 0K/1028M used/tot PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE WAIT TIME CPU COMMAND 10335 root 64 0 676K 1344K onproc/3 - 0:05 19.92% openssl 12027 root 64 0 676K 1344K onproc/0 - 0:05 19.92% openssl 68 root 64 0 612K 1348K run/1 - 0:05 19.87% openssl 8034 root 64 0 676K 1344K onproc/2 - 0:05 19.87% openssl
__________________
Mike Last edited by mikesg; 24th October 2009 at 10:16 PM. |
|
||||
Overall I like this set up alot. I think I could have saved about $40 if I bought the motherboard and chassis separately. SuperMicro also has part number (CSE-RR1U-E8) for a PCI-E 8x riser card, which would allow you to add a 1, 2 or 4 port NIC. The 4 port may interfere with the hard drive bay as they are a lot larger. I ordered the 2.5" drive adapter (MCP-220-00044-0N) which will house two 2.5" drives. It was the same cost as the single drive adapter (which may work better with a large NIC). For the extra cost of buying the barebone, it would have been nice if the drive and riser card adapters were included. Well, don't mean to sound like a commercial. Hope this helps someone out!
__________________
Mike |
|
||||
Quote:
Code:
Three threads: aes-128 cbc 35974.69k 37325.56k 38508.54k 38350.03k 38759.72k aes-192 cbc 31815.56k 33203.59k 33718.86k 33823.87k 33950.77k aes-256 cbc 28432.75k 29196.86k 29655.02k 29736.17k 34759.10k 0m48.01s real 0m0.00s user 0m0.03s system Appreciated, if you could/would. Thanks, mikesg /S
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. They will bring you down to their level and beat you with experience. |
|
||||
Quote:
You can avoid the need for multiple NICs (or expensive multi-port NIC) by using VLANs in combination with a VLAN capable switch. At eight (8) 10/100/1000 ports I like the 3Com (3CDSG8). It's CAD$119 (http://www.onhop.ca/Product/Search/?...4&y=11&=Search). You VLAN-TRUNK the system to the 3Com and then fan out the VLANs on the switch port interface(s), thereby emulating an 8 port (+1 uplink) NIC configuration. If you need gobs of switch-system bandwidth, you can also channelize (trunk(4)) 2x1GB, again, depending on the topology needed and problems being tackled. This saves slots and space inside your chassis. At CAD$119, it also usually cheaper then higher-density NIC cards. /S
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. They will bring you down to their level and beat you with experience. Last edited by s2scott; 23rd October 2009 at 05:39 PM. |
|
||||
Built a second Supermicro system and chose the OCZ Vertex Turbo SSD MLC instead for the Indilinx controller. I've heard of a lot of reliability problems with the jmicron based SSD's. Anyway, I thought I would post the hdd benchmark done earlier for this unit as well:
Code:
# time dd if=/dev/urandom bs=4k count=1024 | openssl enc -e -k 1234 -aes-128-cbc -out /dev/null 1024+0 records in 1024+0 records out 4194304 bytes transferred in 39.636 secs (105820 bytes/sec) 0m39.64s real 0m0.16s user 0m44.77s system Code:
# time dd if=/dev/urandom bs=4k count=1024 | openssl enc -e -k 1234 -aes-128-cbc -out /dev/null 1024+0 records in 1024+0 records out 4194304 bytes transferred in 39.643 secs (105800 bytes/sec) 0m39.64s real 0m0.15s user 0m45.93s system
__________________
Mike Last edited by mikesg; 6th January 2010 at 04:25 PM. |
Tags |
firewall, firewall hardware, hardware |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PF firewall | bsdnewbie999 | OpenBSD General | 3 | 28th April 2009 12:35 PM |
firewall for 2 adsl | milo974 | OpenBSD General | 2 | 13th October 2008 05:03 PM |
The great appliance hunt. | diw | General Hardware | 8 | 23rd July 2008 07:02 PM |
OpenBSD firewall resources | J65nko | OpenBSD Security | 0 | 1st June 2008 02:28 AM |
Web GUI for firewall ? | giga | FreeBSD General | 6 | 8th May 2008 05:10 AM |