|
|||
Adblock Plus investigation
https://www.theverge.com/2020/1/14/2...-investigation
It's a shame Adblock Plus gone bad. But uBlock Origin is still safe to use, right? |
|
|||
I switched from Adblock Plus to uBlock Origin a while ago because it worked better for me.
__________________
Linux since 1999, & also a BSD user. |
|
|||
There is also Privacy Badger from EFF. Does anybody have any experience using it?
|
|
|||
Yes I use Privacy Badger, and I thing is works great, you can see who is tracking the site and who they are. For example, for daemonforums I see this:
Quote:
Last edited by jmccue; 18th January 2020 at 02:15 PM. Reason: spelling |
|
|||
Ads in form of static pictures won't bother me at all. But a lot of ads novadays use javascript, videos that autoplay and pictures with src="?something=foo&something=bar&...".
|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Signature: Furthermore, I consider that systemd must be destroyed. Based on Latin oratorical phrase |
|
||||
Yeah, I agree it's complex; I have no easy answers either.
Right now my website has some ads from codefund.io – which explicitly advertises itself as ethical ads and is fully open source – which are blocked by default by uBlock origin (and I believe also AdBlock). These adblocking tools do much more than just block requests to third-party data-collectors, they frob with the HTML in an attempt to remove every single last ad, and while there is *some* merit to this for the really intrusive/annoying ones, I feel this is fundamentally a misguided approach which doesn't consider the perspective of publishers/product makers. I use uBlock origin too, for all the same reasons as you do, but I don't really like it because of this. I'm currently working full-time on open source stuff, and the income from these ads isn't a bit of pocket-money on the side, it's part of my income. Removing these kind of ads kind of rubs me the wrong way. Basically, I'm "collateral damage". I maintained a "track blocker" (trackwall) for a while, which I think is much more reasonable than an "ad blocker". The current situation sucks for both users and publishers :-( I understand e1-531g's lack of trust on this matter. A kind-of related thing I wrote about this a few weeks ago: https://www.arp242.net/dnt.html
__________________
UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things. |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
BTW uBlock origin is by purpose powerful content-blocker and just happens ad-blocking is the most used feature of this tool. It can prevent or minimize tracking much more effectively than AdBlock Plus.
__________________
Signature: Furthermore, I consider that systemd must be destroyed. Based on Latin oratorical phrase |
|
|||
I do not have a big problem with advertising. If it overwhelms the content I'm seeking, I'll look elsewhere.
To me the issues are tracking, manipulation and privacy. I've set up every browser I use to clear out everything with a click or a couple of keystrokes. I rotate browsers. If this were widely done, it would increase the cost and lower the yield for those sites that harvest data. Last edited by shep; 24th January 2020 at 06:08 PM. |
|
|||
I use 2 different browsers on multiple user accounts on my *BSD box.
For my news I read https://www.theguardian.com/international quite a lot. Because they don't have a paywall, when. I see an ad that interests me I click on it. For daemonforums administration I use a dedicated user account The only "social media" I use are reddit and 2 different Facebook accounts for a couple of private Facebook groups about vermiculture. Actually I cannot stand Facebook, but that is a different story. For these I also use a different BSD user account.
__________________
You don't need to be a genius to debug a pf.conf firewall ruleset, you just need the guts to run tcpdump |
|
||||
Unfortunately advertising is necessary. Without advertisements during television shows and in newspapers, TV programmes would not be free and newspapers would be expensive. Many people complain about advertisement breaks during shows, but they would complain much more if they had to pay for the shows. Like other media, websites need revenue. It is either paid by advertising or by people using the sites.
Advertisements are not a problem in themselves. Ads on the sides of a webpage do not interfere with using a site, and to be honest, I usually ignore them. Occasionally one will pique my interest offering something of interest, then I look at it. If it then looks very interesting or useful I click on it. (That is how I found good deals on airfare.) Advertisements are only a problem when they are intrusive: unwanted pop-ups, redirects, too large, etc. Which is why in the past when I used Seamonkey I set Adblock to only block intrusive ads. Nowadays using Otter and Iridium I do not bother with ad blockers. Data mining and tracking are serious problems though. The solution cannot, and should not, be the responsibility of everyday people using the internet. Such practices need to be eliminated, which requires governments to pass legislation. However, that puts governments in a difficult position. Making data mining and tracking illegal would make it illegal for those governments to spy on their citizens. Bottom line: the solution is easy, but unlikely to be forthcoming. |
|
||||
Quote:
So in the end ... very little happens. You see this on other topics as well, such as climate change (and environmental protection in general).
__________________
UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things. |
|
|||
A few companies in behavioral advertising industry's ecosystem shouldn't say they act within the law, especially GDPR.
__________________
Signature: Furthermore, I consider that systemd must be destroyed. Based on Latin oratorical phrase |
|
|||
If you watch network television, you get ads, whether you want to or not. The broadcasting companies have to make money. I don't know why some think it should be different because you're using the Internet and all ads should be blocked or not allowed.
|
|
||||
The problem is not advertising itself, it is in how it's delivered - i.e. when it's targeted and this invariably involves data mining, tracking, profiling and surveillance. Other media, such as newspaper and broadcast TV and radio don't have this and that's the huge difference between web advertising and any other kind.
Personally if a website just showed basic adverts to gain revenue and that was it, I would not have a problem with it - it's when the site is infested with the usual google tracking, which is part of the "advertising" that I have a problem. I don't use any ad blocker, I do block certain scripts however and it's quite telling that blocking these also removes 99% of ads... |
|
|||
Quote:
Indeed there are companies like ConversionLabs that do really creepy things. You can add something to cart on shop X website, but don't buy it, don't enter any personal details, addresses on this site. ConversionLabs may use data from other shop Y to send you an email about your cart on website X.
__________________
Signature: Furthermore, I consider that systemd must be destroyed. Based on Latin oratorical phrase |
|
||||
Yeah if it were like printed media, specified ads, text only, I wouldn't mind at all. But when I get one of these things, this is an ad supported site, please turn off ad blockers, I want to write them and say, so you guarantee that no ads on your site have malware? This is a problem, maybe google's fault. But the way ads go on a site now seems less up to the webmaster and more up to the ad provider. I would be quite willing to have something like what one sees in newspapers. Static text ads that don't require javascript or anything else.
|
|
|||
If you "read" an average retail company's "privacy policy", it is my non-legal opinion that they can do what they want with your information. For example ignore "do not track settings" as well as referring, selling, marketing you in any manner they want.
i.e. https://kb.newegg.com/knowledge-base/privacy-policy/ |
|
||||
I wouldn't be surprised. I do remember paying cash for something and they started asking for name, address, email and such, and I said, I charge $100 for that. (Nicely, as it wasn't the cashier's fault.) She laughed and that was that.
One thing I'd like to say in retail stores, the cashiers are just doing what they're ordered to do, so taking out anger on them isn't fair. Gosh, I've mellowed in my old age. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Adblock Plus issue in Firefox | victorvas | OpenBSD Packages and Ports | 10 | 11th May 2019 08:31 PM |
Publisher Sues AdBlock Plus For Copyright Infringement | e1-531g | News | 0 | 11th April 2019 11:02 AM |
Security Dutch PKI provider's web site security breach under investigation | J65nko | News | 0 | 8th December 2011 08:24 PM |