|
|
|||
*BSD Laptops
Hello,
Still looking around at various laptops to see if one is viable for me. I looked at various alternate architectures, but I could find one that was affordable (i.e., SPARC Tadpole) or that wasn't a teensy netbook. So looking back at normal x86 consumer laptops. Which x86 processor do you think is best currently - Intel, AMD, VIA? Any particular series or model? What I am looking for is a laptop that is sturdy and rugged - both physically and in system stability. I will not be using this for multimedia purposes (aside from the occasional mp3 or ogg file or stream) so I don't need it tailored for dvd video playback or audio editing, etc. Don't want a webcam or microphone. I do want it to be able to crunch numbers and compile programs like nobodies business. If possible, non-widescreen. And I'd like it to be under $500 (I can upgrade to more RAM, better HD, etc. later on). Any suggestions? I have heard that Thinkpads (currently owned by Lenovo) are rugged *nix machines. Anyone have any experience with them?
__________________
And the WORD was made flesh, and dwelt among us. (John 1:14) |
|
||||
Quote:
If you want battery life (and open source drivers for all OS there), then also get X3100 Intel GMA, if you want horsepower, then get some nVidia or Mobile Radeon. If you do not like widescreen, then you should be able to get a T60/T61 or R60/R60 Thinkpad with non widescreen, but IMHO widescreen is a lot more comfortable (16:10), especially if you add a big resolution to it 1440x900(14") or 1680x1050(15") / 1920x1080(15"). If ou want good laptop, then go for Dell or IBM/Lenovo I would not look at others. From Dell get D630(14") (I have one and would not change it for anything) or D830(15"). My exact specs are Dell D630 Intel T7300 Intel X3100 GMA 2 x 1GB RAM 7200RPM HDD 1440x900(14") anti glare DVD-RW 8+ hours of battery life with 9-cell + 6-cell MultiBay (or ModularBay) It runs these OSes without any problems with hardware accelration for 3D: FreeBSD NetBSD Mac OS X OpenSolaris Linux ... even Xen has drivers for X3100
__________________
religions, worst damnation of mankind "If 386BSD had been available when I started on Linux, Linux would probably never had happened." Linus Torvalds Linux is not UNIX! Face it! It is not an insult. It is fact: GNU is a recursive acronym for “GNU's Not UNIX”. vermaden's: links resources deviantart spreadbsd |
|
|||
Wow, Dell! I've never worked with their laptops, but the desktops of their that I've worked with are so doggedly slow, it is ridiculous. I just assumed that their laptops are the same way.
__________________
And the WORD was made flesh, and dwelt among us. (John 1:14) |
|
||||
Quote:
http://daemonforums.org/showthread.php?t=1881 Performance was that as it shoud be according to the installed hardware (which means good), both Windows and FreeBSD run good there. About these Dell desktops you run, what OS they were running, a Dell preinstalled Windows?
__________________
religions, worst damnation of mankind "If 386BSD had been available when I started on Linux, Linux would probably never had happened." Linus Torvalds Linux is not UNIX! Face it! It is not an insult. It is fact: GNU is a recursive acronym for “GNU's Not UNIX”. vermaden's: links resources deviantart spreadbsd |
|
|||
Quote:
At my work, it is a Dell environment (at least the workstations). We have numerous labs and offices with various Dell setups. They are all slow (even the suped up multimedia lab machines). They all run XP. Usually, they perform adequately, but any sort of load chokes it down instantly. The worse is when you go to a machine you haven't been on before - it goes to create your user profile on the machine (all this via zenworks). This process of all the settings takes a good 5-10 minutes to complete.
__________________
And the WORD was made flesh, and dwelt among us. (John 1:14) |
|
||||
Quote:
The other case is bloated preinstalled Windows with many apps started by default, but that can be very easy fixed with reinstall, as always with Windows. Also as you use Windows it slows down because of all shit being installed and added, DLLs services and so. The only workable sollution for that is using this trio: GoBack (or similar) Sandboxie (does most work) Trust-no-EXE
__________________
religions, worst damnation of mankind "If 386BSD had been available when I started on Linux, Linux would probably never had happened." Linus Torvalds Linux is not UNIX! Face it! It is not an insult. It is fact: GNU is a recursive acronym for “GNU's Not UNIX”. vermaden's: links resources deviantart spreadbsd |
|
||||
Hmm... I remember going for a $500 laptop once, my sister wound up paying $750 + I paid $100 in restocking frees for another $650 laptop, in order to get FreeBSD working. There are some systems that are cheap in the $500 range, but as with any system -> try to make sure you will get working hardware. Heck, one buddy got a (high spec) vista machine for about $450 and couldn't even get XP running on it.
If you find a model you're going to by, check the hardware compatibility lists for it and then hit google -> make sure it's no paper weight before you buy. Do likewise with any important hardware you're not prepared to replace or live without (sound, networking, basic fn key combos). For processors, it shouldn't really matter that much. Depending on /age/ of the laptop, you're basically looking at Pentium M, Core, Core 2, Celeron, Mobile Sempron, Mobile Athlon64, or Turion64. I'd an suggest Intel Core 2 chip where possible, but I doubt you would be disapointed with a (good model of) Turion 64 from AMD. And do not shop by clock rate alone. Via, I can't speak for their processors, having never used them on PCs period, let along notebooks.
__________________
My Journal Thou shalt check the array bounds of all strings (indeed, all arrays), for surely where thou typest ``foo'' someone someday shall type ``supercalifragilisticexpialidocious''. |
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
I would also suggest checking reviews from here: http://www.notebookreview.com/
__________________
religions, worst damnation of mankind "If 386BSD had been available when I started on Linux, Linux would probably never had happened." Linus Torvalds Linux is not UNIX! Face it! It is not an insult. It is fact: GNU is a recursive acronym for “GNU's Not UNIX”. vermaden's: links resources deviantart spreadbsd |
|
|||
Well, since I am in no position to suggest software policy, I guess I'm stuck with Ghost.
__________________
And the WORD was made flesh, and dwelt among us. (John 1:14) |
|
|||
So I just bought a new laptop. A Lenovo T61!
I am spending so much time at the University, that I needed a computer that I can take with me so I have more than an hour or two to work on my assignments when I get home. Specs: Intel T9300 processor (2.5 GHz; 6MB L2 cache; 800 MHz FSB) 4 GB PC-5300 667 MHz RAM (2 DIMM) 160 GB 7200 RPM HD DVD 8x Recordable Slimdrive 15.4" WXGA TFT Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Intel GMA X3100 GM965 Graphics 9 Cell Li-Ion Battery It is coming with SUSE Enterprise Desktop 10, which I may toy around with for half a day (though, I do hope they ship me the discs), but I'll be putting NetBSD on it.
__________________
And the WORD was made flesh, and dwelt among us. (John 1:14) |
|
||||
Good choice mate.
__________________
religions, worst damnation of mankind "If 386BSD had been available when I started on Linux, Linux would probably never had happened." Linus Torvalds Linux is not UNIX! Face it! It is not an insult. It is fact: GNU is a recursive acronym for “GNU's Not UNIX”. vermaden's: links resources deviantart spreadbsd |
|
|||
I ended up buying it from their outlet store, because it appears they just dropped offering the X3100 integrated graphics in the T61 (though it's still offered in the T400 & T500) - the only option now is the discrete nVidia video card.
__________________
And the WORD was made flesh, and dwelt among us. (John 1:14) |
|
||||
T400/T500/R400/R500 offer X4500 intel GMA, not X3100, its a lot better and uses even less power, but it will be supported on FreeBSD at about year or so propably, while X3100 support is avialable evenrywhere.
__________________
religions, worst damnation of mankind "If 386BSD had been available when I started on Linux, Linux would probably never had happened." Linus Torvalds Linux is not UNIX! Face it! It is not an insult. It is fact: GNU is a recursive acronym for “GNU's Not UNIX”. vermaden's: links resources deviantart spreadbsd |
|
||||
The Fujitsu Lifebooks utilize very tried and true chip sets for everything -- sata, video, LAN, WAN, et cetera. I've had very good success with them as non-Windows, i.e. *BSD, O/S hardware targets.
/S
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. They will bring you down to their level and beat you with experience. |
|
||||
Quote:
Tell what chipsets, what NICs, WiFis, models, manufacturers, Jujitsu models and so.
__________________
religions, worst damnation of mankind "If 386BSD had been available when I started on Linux, Linux would probably never had happened." Linus Torvalds Linux is not UNIX! Face it! It is not an insult. It is fact: GNU is a recursive acronym for “GNU's Not UNIX”. vermaden's: links resources deviantart spreadbsd |
|
|||
Does anyone have any info/opinion on whether it matters if you get "dual core" or "core2 duo" for freebsd? I know core2 is the way to go but my last laptop, which just died, was a P4 so either would be better than what I had but I can't get myself to get anything but a core2. The prices on the dual core, however, are $100-200 cheaper and I'm cheap. My last laptop was given to me for free.
Are both of those 64-bit? I just read something that gave me that impression. I really haven't read up on this stuff, and I'm a former hardware guy! So, above, someone said I should look into the Turion64. I'd be just as happy with someone's 3-year old Windows "upgrade" throwaway. Something that, if it broke in a couple years, I wouldn't care. |
|
|||
Quote:
My T61 with a Core 2 Duo (T9300) and 4GB RAM flies! I've never been a big fan of Intel - always being an AMD fan - but I have no complaints with this processor.
__________________
And the WORD was made flesh, and dwelt among us. (John 1:14) |
|
||||
Core 2 Duo descendants (T5xxx / T7xxx / T8xxx / p8xxx) are 64bit CPUs, Core Duo descendants (T1xxx / T2xxx) are 32bit CPUs, its best to check @ Wikipedia first:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...icroprocessors http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...icroprocessors Recently they also added T3200 (Code Duo) and T5800 (Code 2 Duo) CPUs which are not listed @ Wikipedia. You can also check Intel's Processor Finder: http://processorfinder.intel.com/det...px?sSpec=SLAVG http://processorfinder.intel.com/ Imho get used Dell Latitude / IBM/Lenovo ThinkPad with Core 2 Duo t7xxx / t8xxx.
__________________
religions, worst damnation of mankind "If 386BSD had been available when I started on Linux, Linux would probably never had happened." Linus Torvalds Linux is not UNIX! Face it! It is not an insult. It is fact: GNU is a recursive acronym for “GNU's Not UNIX”. vermaden's: links resources deviantart spreadbsd |
|
||||
AMD processors are behind in terms of performance, raw performance. I'd go for the best you can for the price. So, you should compare the best AMD and the best Intel within your price range.
__________________
"UNIX is basically a simple operating system, but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity." MacBook Pro (Darwin 9), iMac (Darwin 9), iPod Touch (Darwin 9), Dell Optiplex GX620 (FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE) |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is it worth upgrading this laptops RAM | TerryP | General Hardware | 4 | 17th January 2009 04:56 AM |
Alternative Architecture Laptops | JMJ_coder | General Hardware | 6 | 7th October 2008 05:05 PM |
FreeBSD on laptops? | ViperChief | FreeBSD General | 3 | 26th May 2008 12:40 PM |