DaemonForums  

Go Back   DaemonForums > Miscellaneous > General Hardware

General Hardware General hardware related questions.

View Poll Results: Most reliable?
Seagate 5 16.67%
Western Digital 15 50.00%
Maxtor 4 13.33%
Hitachi 3 10.00%
Toshiba 0 0%
Samsung 0 0%
Quantum 1 3.33%
other ... 2 6.67%
Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9th August 2009
windependence's Avatar
windependence windependence is offline
Real Name: Tim
Shell Scout
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 116
Default

Manufacturer Agnostic here. Since 1982 (before PCs) I have seen all of them have bad runs of drives. I have had very very few fail over the years.

The new drives now have a MTBF of 1,000,000 hours, which is roughly 114 years. Like Vermaden mentioned, seek time is a big factor, and you have idiots who won't buy a drive because it runs at 5400 RPM, which is cooler anyway, and if the access time is better rotational speed means nothing (except more heat).

-Tim
__________________
www.windependence.org
Get your Windependence today!
Reply With Quote
Old 12th August 2009
Crypt Crypt is offline
Port Guard
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Whitby, Ontario
Posts: 36
Default

I have always had issues with WD caviar drives. Everyone I have ever had has crashed and burned. Maxtor and Seagate I have never had issues with. I believe I have an old Samsung drive around here that is about a 500mb drive that still works perfectly. I'll have to find that drive to make sure it is a Samsung though
Reply With Quote
Old 14th August 2009
ephemera's Avatar
ephemera ephemera is offline
Knuth's homeboy
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 537
Default

I just came across this article: http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=864058
(Somewhat offtopic but interesting nevertheless.)
Reply With Quote
Old 14th August 2009
vermaden's Avatar
vermaden vermaden is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: pl_PL.lodz
Posts: 1,056
Default

@ephemera

After you article/link I just recalled Google report on disk failures according to their working temperature:
http://labs.google.com/papers/disk_failures.pdf
__________________
religions, worst damnation of mankind
"If 386BSD had been available when I started on Linux, Linux would probably never had happened." Linus Torvalds

Linux is not UNIX! Face it! It is not an insult. It is fact: GNU is a recursive acronym for “GNU's Not UNIX”.
vermaden's: links resources deviantart spreadbsd
Reply With Quote
Old 21st August 2009
chris chris is offline
Port Guard
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 35
Default

I have had a particular WD hard drive for 8 years now which has been under fairly heavy usage for most of that time and only recently has it started firing warning shots by spinning down when it gets too hot. If a hard drive is going to fail it should do so with kindness by giving you some cautionary advice, and that's just what WD appears to do.

Having said that, like most people here I don't have any particularly bad experiences with any other hard disk vendor.
Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2010
michaelrmgreen's Avatar
michaelrmgreen michaelrmgreen is offline
Fdisk Soldier
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 49
Default

FWIW I've had problems with WD and success with Seagate. My stratagy (if you can call it that) is to buy drives that are 'old fashioned', in other words mature technologies. This means they tend to be at the small end of the available size range.

I may well be mistaken, but I understood SCSI disks to be mechanically the same as the equivalent IDE drives. Perhaps the smarter SCSI electronics make the life of the mechanical parts easier. If not then why would they be better?
Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2010
jggimi's Avatar
jggimi jggimi is offline
More noise than signal
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 7,977
Default

No, the difference is in the channel technology.
  • A SCSI bus allows simultaneous transfers between the host and multiple targets. So your OS can read from one disk while writing to another, which is the biggest advantage. In addition, one can string many devices onto a single SCSI bus, if necessary. In addition, the SCSI bus can be shared by multiple computing systems -- allowing for shared storage systems, but not shared devices.
  • IDE is limited to a communicating with a single device at a time, and has a maximum of two peripheral devices per bus, with a single host.
Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2010
vermaden's Avatar
vermaden vermaden is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: pl_PL.lodz
Posts: 1,056
Default

Failure drives for sure:
http://silentpcreview.com/Terabyte_Drive_Fix
__________________
religions, worst damnation of mankind
"If 386BSD had been available when I started on Linux, Linux would probably never had happened." Linus Torvalds

Linux is not UNIX! Face it! It is not an insult. It is fact: GNU is a recursive acronym for “GNU's Not UNIX”.
vermaden's: links resources deviantart spreadbsd
Reply With Quote
Old 17th March 2010
welkin welkin is offline
Port Guard
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 21
Default

I dont even know which harddisk brand I have. But never got any problems with it.
Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2010
ocicat ocicat is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,318
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by welkin View Post
I dont even know which harddisk brand I have.
You should find information within your dmesg(8) output.
Reply With Quote
Old 5th April 2010
Crypt Crypt is offline
Port Guard
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Whitby, Ontario
Posts: 36
Default

Over the years i have had computers, the only hard drives I have ever had issues with over the years were all made by WD. I still have a 500mb Samsung drive that works perfectly, and I have never had any issues with Seagate or Maxtor. My main system have been running a Maxtor or Seagate drive for the last 10 years and I have yet to have one fail. I have tried a few WD drives out and they have all failed in one of my other systems and have had to replace them time and time again to the point where I will never use another WD made drive again
Reply With Quote
Old 8th April 2010
Broodjegehaktmetmayo Broodjegehaktmetmayo is offline
Shell Scout
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 92
Default

Have been using Seagate for approx 20 years now without any problems whatsoever. Only due to the 7200.11 bug last year I decided to go with WD RE3, following Carpetsmoker's recommendation. And they are nice and quiet and fast enough for my purposes.
Reply With Quote
Old 20th April 2010
vermaden's Avatar
vermaden vermaden is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: pl_PL.lodz
Posts: 1,056
Default

Nice guide on harddisks, Hard Disk Drive Reference Guide:
http://storagereview.com/hard_disk_d...eference_guide
__________________
religions, worst damnation of mankind
"If 386BSD had been available when I started on Linux, Linux would probably never had happened." Linus Torvalds

Linux is not UNIX! Face it! It is not an insult. It is fact: GNU is a recursive acronym for “GNU's Not UNIX”.
vermaden's: links resources deviantart spreadbsd
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mounting NTFS external hard disk. bsdnewbie999 OpenBSD General 16 4th September 2010 01:59 PM
Formatting Hard Disk Drive to UFS in OS X 10.5 Turquoise88 Other BSD and UNIX/UNIX-like 1 7th March 2009 09:57 PM
Hard disk bottle neck deathsoul FreeBSD General 1 28th September 2008 10:44 AM
Copy VCD film to hard disk mfaridi FreeBSD General 4 5th June 2008 01:57 PM
how to mount external hard disk ? bsdnewbie999 FreeBSD General 6 27th May 2008 02:37 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content copyright © 2007-2010, the authors
Daemon image copyright ©1988, Marshall Kirk McKusick