|
General Hardware General hardware related questions. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
I'm worried, a little... but recent news claims they might sell off their chip manufacturing operations, I assume they would still be owners, but they wouldn't be actually building the chips they design.. AFAIK.
Even though they're hurting financially, they still are contributing.. more GPU docs are on their way. |
|
|||
Heck no
http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.../04/23/1948204
Lots of companies are having a bit of a hard time right now. But AMD has done wonders, and I believe will continue to do wonders, for the CPU market. They're no Cyrix/6x86 ^_^ The biggest drawback that AMD has going against them right now is that they have to pay Intel for the i386 architecture license. If they can find someway around that, they'd be golden. |
|
||||
Before AMD has been cut into AMD and GlobalFoundries I was little worried, but not right now:
__________________
religions, worst damnation of mankind "If 386BSD had been available when I started on Linux, Linux would probably never had happened." Linus Torvalds Linux is not UNIX! Face it! It is not an insult. It is fact: GNU is a recursive acronym for “GNU's Not UNIX”. vermaden's: links resources deviantart spreadbsd |
|
||||
I took a very quick look at their recent balance sheet (which is considerably more than I'm competent to do ... ). It shows slightly negative shareholder equity, and taking out goodwill and intangibles about -1 U$ / share on a $3.5 stock. Forward earnings estimates (for what they're worth) are negative. Overall, not particularly reassuring to me, but (a) the future is unknown and (b) WTFDIK .
ADDED: Disclosure: I don't have any direct position (long or short) in AMD. Last edited by IdOp; 27th April 2009 at 05:30 PM. Reason: add link and last bit |
|
||||
Not worried in the least; although in some ways, I think I wish I had some AMD stock while the getting may be good lol.
__________________
My Journal Thou shalt check the array bounds of all strings (indeed, all arrays), for surely where thou typest ``foo'' someone someday shall type ``supercalifragilisticexpialidocious''. |
|
||||
While Intel may have the upper-hand in pure performance at the high end (Nehalem), it comes at a huge price: new motherboard/chipset, new CPU(s), new RAM. The "upgrade" path is (as is usual with Intel) to buy all new hardware.
AMD may not have the fastest CPU architecture out there, but it's not horrible either. When it comes to performance/watt, price/watt and other similar metrics, AMD is doing quite nicely. They also have a very nice upgrade path. You can use Phenom IIs in AM2 or AM3 motherboards, you can use them with DDR2 or DDR3 RAM. IOW, you can actually upgrade the hardware as opposed to just replacing it. AMD also has an easier to understand model numbering scheme, and it's very easy to figure out which CPU features are supported by which CPUs. It's next to impossible to know, just by the model numbers, which Intel CPU is better than which other Intel CPU (especially when it comes to CPU features like Intel VT). I swear, Intel just rolls a bunch of ten-sided dice and uses that for the model numbers. Until you can buy a Nehalem-based server with 2x quad-core CPUs, 8 GB of RAM, 4-port gigabit NIC, 2 RAID controllers, 24 SATA harddrives, and redundant PSU in a hot-swappable rackmount case for ~$10,000 CDN, AMD has nothing to worry about. At least where we are. Same for desktops. Until they have a box equivalent to ours (onboard nVidia graphics, gigabit NIC, 2+ GHz CPU, 1 GB RAM, onboard sound, etc) for < $250 CDN, we'll continue buying AMD. So, no, we're definitely not worried about AMD. |
|
|||
Another thought that I had that puts my trust still with AMD:
Check out the new Gigabyte boards for the AM3 architecture. They're AM2+ compliant, so you can buy one and use your current proc, and when the prices on the AM3's drop, you can swap it out no problem. Supports DDR3 RAM and everything. It's unprecedented backwards compatibility that hasn't happened before. The ability to use either old-gen or new-gen CPU's on the same Mobo slot is just beautiful IMHO. |
|
||||
The Phenom II and Shanghai Opteron CPU's are a good competition for the Intel Core 2 and Xeon CPU's, and usually at a cheaper pricetag too.
If I would buy a new PC, I would probably buy an AMD. However, AMD has nothing even close to the i7, and I don't expect they will have anytime soon (And by that time Intel is faster again, tick/tock). Half a year ago we were still selling a few AMD desktop systems, now we are selling almost none. For server systems it's even worse, almost like Opteron doesn't even exist. I'm not saying one computer store is representative for the entire world, but from where I'm sitting, it doesn't seem to go very well with AMD... As a general note, I think more competition on the CPU (And GPU) market would be a (very!) good thing ...
__________________
UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things. |
|
||||
> Half a year ago we were still selling a few AMD desktop systems, now we are selling almost none.
You pretty much echoed the scene at my place - it's all Intel. I buy Intel too. For laptops they are an obvious choice and for desktops it's simply that I can't find a motherboard I like for AMD. I guess AMD could do better by improving their marketing / PR or something. As the reviews from the links in Vermaden's post show, AMD is competitive in the low/mid price range. The Phenom II 955 looks pretty good too. |
|
|||
When the marketplace only has one vendor, we are completely at their mercy in terms of both pricing & willingness to innovate.
Just remember that a decade ago we had DEC, HP, & Motorola in the chip business, but Intel's predatory practices were major factors in the demise of these companies by hiring key developers away. Now, even the future of Sun is in question. While AMD has had a checkered history in offering solid competition to Intel, at least they were providing competition, & competition helps keep the market players honest. |
|
||||
There is also this supid attitude to AMD processors (chipsets and so) on some companies, for example my previous boss thought that AMD processors are shit and we were Intel all the way, what a lack of competense :/
__________________
religions, worst damnation of mankind "If 386BSD had been available when I started on Linux, Linux would probably never had happened." Linus Torvalds Linux is not UNIX! Face it! It is not an insult. It is fact: GNU is a recursive acronym for “GNU's Not UNIX”. vermaden's: links resources deviantart spreadbsd |
|
||||
There is an old theory, some thing like people get promoted until they reach a point at which they are incompetent for the job ;-)
__________________
My Journal Thou shalt check the array bounds of all strings (indeed, all arrays), for surely where thou typest ``foo'' someone someday shall type ``supercalifragilisticexpialidocious''. |
|
||||
I had a customer today who wanted to buy a new system, I mentioned AMD.
His response: ``Bleh, that's a dirty word'' :-/
__________________
UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things. |
|
|||
So how well are the recent AMD and nVidia chipsets supported in FreeBSD? That is, the consumer ones, and not the server ones. Traditionally I've found the Intel chipsets just to work better, but most of those supporting the AMD platform have been out for a while now.
|
|
|||
Quote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/30/te...chip.html?_r=1 |
|
|