|
NetBSD Package System (pkgsrc) Installation and upgrading of packages on NetBSD. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
2022Q2 binary question
SOLVED
I saw this bsdsec.net about the new branch. I am wondering, if I wanted to get the latest firefox-esr, should I just compile it (via pkgsrc) ? I am hoping I could modify file "/usr/pkg/etc/pkgin/repositories.conf " with the 2022Q2 binary location, but seems that is not the case (after may searches). BTW, I am OK compiling the firefox-esr, but would like to avoid it if possible. Thanks
__________________
[t]csh(1) - "An elegant shell, for a more... civilized age." - Paraphrasing Star Wars (tvtropes.org) Last edited by jmccue; 7th July 2022 at 08:14 PM. Reason: marked solved |
|
|||
Binary packages are built on the New York NBSD servers. At the time of this post, the builds are in progress with no 2022Q2 binaries published.
http://nyftp.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/p...64/9.0_2022Q2/ You have 2 options. Wait until the projects binaries are published or start building them yourself. On a long build like firefox, it is tempting to use the latest source and it can often lead to dependency issues if you mix source builds and binaries. Also note that the Mozilla project just released Firefox-esr 102.0esr https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/102.0esr/ At this time, pkgsrc for firefox-esr still points to firefox91 http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/...x-esr/Makefile My sense is that 102.Xesr will not enter binary builds until 2022Q3. |
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
“Mi casa tendrá dos piernas y mis sueños no tendrán fronteras„ |
|
|||
Thanks all.
I will wait for the binary packages on the New York servers. I was doing that but got confused thinking Q2 packages would not be available until the first week in Q3. Will try and mark this solved
__________________
[t]csh(1) - "An elegant shell, for a more... civilized age." - Paraphrasing Star Wars (tvtropes.org) |
|
|||
SOLVED
SOLVED -- (for 9.x)
I just had to wait As a note to people wanting to upgrade packages to the latest quarter, you should use port pkgin, it makes things easier. But I got odd messages when doing a pkgin, which I ignored for a while. Seems I had entries in /usr/pkg/etc/pkgin/repositories.conf that caused issues. The pkgsrc docs with comments in the file confused me a bit. (Thanks to @Riastradh in #pkgsrc on liberachat on setting me straight) This shows what to do:
Change Entry From https://cdn.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/packages/NetBSD/$arch/9.0/All TO https://cdn.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/packages/NetBSD/$arch/9.0_2022Q2/All The do a `pkgin upgrade` as root once packages are built. That is how I was able to upgrade packages to the latest quarterly without any issues.
__________________
[t]csh(1) - "An elegant shell, for a more... civilized age." - Paraphrasing Star Wars (tvtropes.org) |
Tags |
binary, pkgsrc, updating |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question about i386 binary package availability, vs amd64 | blackhole | NetBSD Package System (pkgsrc) | 6 | 21st October 2015 09:17 PM |
Simple question about binary upgrade | unixjingleman | OpenBSD Installation and Upgrading | 2 | 27th May 2011 02:10 PM |
Linux Binary: cannot execute binary file | xmorg | FreeBSD General | 3 | 25th September 2010 03:46 PM |
external drive partition question + fdisk question | gosha | OpenBSD General | 15 | 15th June 2009 02:00 PM |
minicom binary | csimmons0 | FreeBSD Ports and Packages | 2 | 29th January 2009 09:18 PM |