DaemonForums  

Go Back   DaemonForums > FreeBSD > FreeBSD General

FreeBSD General Other questions regarding FreeBSD which do not fit in any of the categories below.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   (View Single Post)  
Old 17th July 2008
sixshot sixshot is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 5
Default Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode

My Freebsd 6.2 server has crashed twice in the past month requireing a hard reboot eache time to reset. Below is a copy of whats on the screen when this happens for both times. Could it be spam assasin, I have added more hosting accounts in the past couple of months and there is a lot more spam filtering going on. I notice that the perl based spam assasin uses a ton of processing to filter. I am not currently using block lists. I got this server brand new last year and have never had a problem until a month ago. I am going to do a memory scan on the ram tonight.

Any ideas?



June 17 08
----------------------------------------------

kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled

Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode

cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
fault virtual address = 0x104
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc066c731
stack pointer = 0x28:8xe34f0c90
frame pointer = 0x28:0xe34f0c9c
code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0xlb
= DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1
processor eflags = resume, IOPL = 0
current process = 5 (thread taskq)
trap number = 12
panic: page fault
cpuid = 0
Uptime: 151d22h34m56s
Cannot dump. No dump device defined.
Automatic reboot in 15 seconds - press a key on the console to abort
Rebooting...
cpu_reset: Stopping other CPUs



7-16-08
--------------------------------------
kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled

Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode

cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
fault virtual address = 0x104
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc066c731
stack pointer = 0x28:8xe34f0c90
frame pointer = 0x28:0xe34f0c9c
code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0xlb
= DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1
processor eflags = resume, IOPL = 0
current process = 5 (thread taskq)
trap number = 12
panic: page fault
cpuid = 1
Reply With Quote
  #2   (View Single Post)  
Old 17th July 2008
robbak's Avatar
robbak robbak is offline
Real Name: Robert Backhaus
VPN Cryptographer
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Queensland, Australia
Posts: 366
Default

You might want to configure your system with some swap space (at least equal to the memory size), and ensure /var/crash contains free space at least equal to the system memory.

If this is true ( and you have not disabled core dumping in rc.conf), FreeBSD will save a core dump when it panics, and you will be able to get a backtrace, like this:

# kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel /var/crash/vmcore.0
> bt

Although fully understanding backtraces is a fairly advanced science, they can often tell even a novice where the problems are.
__________________
The only dumb question is a question not asked.
The only dumb answer is an answer not given.
Reply With Quote
  #3   (View Single Post)  
Old 17th July 2008
sixshot sixshot is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 5
Default

Right now var is a 10 gig partition with 20% used. in var/crash there is a minfree file set to 2048 bu there is no vmcore.0 or other files that minfree in there. I will look into setting up swap space.
Reply With Quote
  #4   (View Single Post)  
Old 17th July 2008
sixshot sixshot is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 5
Default

last pid: 7054; load averages: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00 up 0+07:39:38 18:22:58
78 processes: 1 running, 77 sleeping
CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 100% idle
Mem: 135M Active, 275M Inact, 123M Wired, 32K Cache, 110M Buf, 456M Free
Swap: 3072M Total, 3072M Free


I am not sure but this top statment says something about swap space
Reply With Quote
  #5   (View Single Post)  
Old 17th July 2008
TerryP's Avatar
TerryP TerryP is offline
Arp Constable
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USofA
Posts: 1,547
Default

Code:
Terry@dixie$ swapctl -lh                                                   4:24
Device:       1048576-blocks      Used:
/dev/ad0s1b          860          0
Terry@dixie$                                                               4:24
__________________
My Journal

Thou shalt check the array bounds of all strings (indeed, all arrays), for surely where thou typest ``foo'' someone someday shall type ``supercalifragilisticexpialidocious''.
Reply With Quote
  #6   (View Single Post)  
Old 17th July 2008
sixshot sixshot is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 5
Default

Ya

#/>swapctl -lh
Device: 1048576-blocks Used:
/dev/ad4s1b 3072 0
Reply With Quote
  #7   (View Single Post)  
Old 17th July 2008
ephemera's Avatar
ephemera ephemera is offline
Knuth's homeboy
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 537
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sixshot View Post
Right now var is a 10 gig partition with 20% used. in var/crash there is a minfree file set to 2048 bu there is no vmcore.0 or other files that minfree in there. I will look into setting up swap space.
you will need to run savecore(8) either manually or specify it in rc.conf.
Reply With Quote
  #8   (View Single Post)  
Old 17th July 2008
robbak's Avatar
robbak robbak is offline
Real Name: Robert Backhaus
VPN Cryptographer
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Queensland, Australia
Posts: 366
Default

Let's not forget that the problem is a sig12(kernel page fault), not the lack of a coredump.

The usual suspects:
1. memory faults
2. Binary kernel modules (nvidia/ltmdm etc)
3. Bugs in kernel code (very unlikely)

Getting a dump will help track down 2 & 3, and that memory test _should_ rule out #1.

If you do have any kernel modules from ports, make sure you rebuild them every time you upgrade the kernel.

RE: the dumps:
I was of the impression that, if swap and /var/crash were big enough, dumpon and savecore would be run automagically by their respective rc.d scripts (/etc/rc.d/dumpon and /etc/rc.d/savecore), but this might not be the case in 6.x.
Check your dmesg (or /var/log/messages) for comments on savecore and dumpon, and check /etc/defaults/rc.conf for variables controlling them (put any changes in /etc/rc.conf, of course (sorry if you didn't need that reminder!)).
__________________
The only dumb question is a question not asked.
The only dumb answer is an answer not given.
Reply With Quote
  #9   (View Single Post)  
Old 17th July 2008
sixshot sixshot is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 5
Default

I tested the memory and it was fine. The system had 1 gig. I went ahead and added another gig to bring it up to 2 gig. I have not as yet upgraded the kernel. Since I know the memory is ok maybe the problem is a Binary kernel module but I am not sure of the best way to track it down. I am going to subscribe to an rbl list like spamhaus to cut down on spam assasins work. I hope with that and the extra gig of ram the problem goes away. But if anyone has any further ideas im all ears.
Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2008
J65nko J65nko is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Budel - the Netherlands
Posts: 4,159
Default

Bad memory is usually the cause of signal 11 errors.

Please follow the procedure outlined in the FreeBSD FAQ about trap 12 errors: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO...#TRAP-12-PANIC
__________________
You don't need to be a genius to debug a pf.conf firewall ruleset, you just need the guts to run tcpdump
Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2008
sysop1 sysop1 is offline
sysopOne
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1
Default

I'm having same issue as you, sixshot, and I may have found what is causing the problem (at least in my case). Some differences though - I'm running FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE - but the I have same issue with recurring "Fatal trap 12".

I've tested all my RAM-modules separately (memtest86+) and they are OK.

The system seems to crash when writing big/many files over the network with smb protocol (Samba) to any of the filesystems (ZFS) on any of the drives. It seems that the harddrive (the one writing data, in this case /dev/ad16) gets disconnected just before the kernel dumps.

Here is my core dump message:
Code:
Unread portion of the kernel message buffer:
ad16: FAILURE - device detached
subdisk16: detached
ad16: detached

Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
fault virtual address   = 0x2c
fault code              = supervisor write, page not present
instruction pointer     = 0x20:0x807489f5
stack pointer           = 0x28:0xd45ffc5c
frame pointer           = 0x28:0xd45ffc70
code segment            = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b
                        = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1
processor eflags        = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
current process         = 3 (g_up)
trap number             = 12
panic: page fault
cpuid = 0
Uptime: 7m42s
Physical memory: 1267 MB
Dumping 115 MB: 100 84 68 52 36 20 4

#0  doadump () at pcpu.h:195
195     pcpu.h: No such file or directory.
        in pcpu.h
I'm suspecting that it's my PSU (350W cheap one) that can't provide enough power for my rig. I have pretty much stuff and eight harddrives in it.
I'm trying to monitor the voltage, but don't know if results reported by mbmon/chm are valid. If they are I have some serious issues with too small PSU:
Code:
chm: 
+5V  = 4.14
+12V = 12.06
-12V = -6
-5V = -2.14
mbmon: 
+5V  = 4.27
+12V = 11.73
-12V = -5.34 
-5V = -1.97
Am I walking on thin ice with my guess?

Or could it be something connected to the numerous problems reported with the ZFS implementation (labeled Experimental) in FreeBSD 7? Have gotten a share load of those errors too, but they use to report different trap numbers and error messages.
Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2008
robbak's Avatar
robbak robbak is offline
Real Name: Robert Backhaus
VPN Cryptographer
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Queensland, Australia
Posts: 366
Default

the -5 and -12 voltages are rarely used these days. Sound cards used to use them to for their power amplifiers back when they had them, and some modems used them similarly.

It is interesting that the smaller power-supply specs omit -5V, as it is used only on old ISA cards.

Anyway, power supplies are a possible cause of instability, as are failed capacitors (remember the capacitor plague of a few years ago?).
__________________
The only dumb question is a question not asked.
The only dumb answer is an answer not given.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
panic, trap 12

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
4.5_packages web page - not working? jsmith6134 OpenBSD Packages and Ports 2 6th May 2009 02:37 PM
fatal error fvwm Nk2Network OpenBSD General 7 10th January 2009 02:49 PM
page fault error 12 Mr-Biscuit FreeBSD General 2 23rd December 2008 11:58 AM
First time page / Start page bichumo General software and network 7 27th October 2008 10:40 PM
Man Page Numbers JMJ_coder Off-Topic 5 22nd May 2008 04:51 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content copyright © 2007-2010, the authors
Daemon image copyright ©1988, Marshall Kirk McKusick