DaemonForums  

Go Back   DaemonForums > NetBSD > NetBSD Installation and Upgrading
Reload this Page Installation programs
FAQ Today's Posts Search

NetBSD Installation and Upgrading Have trouble getting NetBSD on your toaster?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   (View Single Post)  
Old 9th December 2023
J65nko J65nko is offline
Administrator
  
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Budel - the Netherlands
Posts: 4,165
Default Installation programs
I would like to try NetBSD but I cannot find a description of the installation programs.

From the installation directory:
Code:
NetBSD-10.0_RC1-amd64-bios-install.img.gz         06-Nov-2023 02:33  824M
NetBSD-10.0_RC1-amd64-bios-install.img.gz.torrent 07-Nov-2023 14:10   32K

NetBSD-10.0_RC1-amd64-install.img.gz              06-Nov-2023 02:29  825M
NetBSD-10.0_RC1-amd64-install.img.gz.torrent      07-Nov-2023 14:10   32K

NetBSD-10.0_RC1-amd64-live.img.gz                 06-Nov-2023 02:41  431M
NetBSD-10.0_RC1-amd64-live.img.gz.torrent         07-Nov-2023 14:10   34K

NetBSD-10.0_RC1-amd64.iso                         06-Nov-2023 02:26  594M
Starting from the bottom ......
  • The "*amd64.iso" is clear, an installation image to write to a CD/DVD.
  • The "torrent" and ".gz" stuff I understand.
  • "*amd64-live.img" is an image for a live system. I assume an image for a USB stick/pen.
  • "*amd64-install.img", an USB stick image
  • "*amd64-bios-install.img", another USB stick image
What is the difference between the last two images? When do I use "*install.img", and when "*amd64-bios-install"?
__________________
You don't need to be a genius to debug a pf.conf firewall ruleset, you just need the guts to run tcpdump
Reply With Quote
  #2   (View Single Post)  
Old 9th December 2023
bsd-keith bsd-keith is offline
Real Name: Keith
Open Source Software user
  
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Surrey/Hants Border, England
Posts: 361
Default
UEFI installs (& BIOS, I think) are done with install.img - UEFI still under development, but worked for me....
bios-install.img works on BIOS systems (only), the old way, before UEFI.
__________________
Linux since 1999, & also a BSD user.
Reply With Quote
  #3   (View Single Post)  
Old 9th December 2023
J65nko J65nko is offline
Administrator
  
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Budel - the Netherlands
Posts: 4,165
Default
I don't understand why this has not been documented somewhere ........
__________________
You don't need to be a genius to debug a pf.conf firewall ruleset, you just need the guts to run tcpdump
Reply With Quote
  #4   (View Single Post)  
Old 9th December 2023
shep shep is offline
Real Name: Scott
Arp Constable
  
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dry and Dusty
Posts: 1,517
Default
Anyone have an explanation for the 824M - 594M size discrepency between the usb images and the CD iso?
Reply With Quote
  #5   (View Single Post)  
Old 10th December 2023
jmccue jmccue is offline
Real Name: John McCue
Package Pilot
  
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: here
Posts: 188
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by shep View Post
Anyone have an explanation for the 824M - 594M size discrepency between the usb images and the CD iso?
I have no real explanation. But if I had to guess

The file system on the iso is different than the image, so I would guess block sizes comes into play.
__________________
[t]csh(1) - "An elegant shell, for a more... civilized age."
- Paraphrasing Star Wars (tvtropes.org)
Reply With Quote
  #6   (View Single Post)  
Old 23rd February 2024
J65nko J65nko is offline
Administrator
  
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Budel - the Netherlands
Posts: 4,165
Default
The difference between the two USB images has been documented in the Quick install notes for the impatient from the NetBSD/NetBSD-10.0_RC4/amd64/INSTALL.html document :
Quote:
If installing via USB, you must first uncompress the USB image, which is gzipped. Note the amd64 architecture has two images, NetBSD-10.0_RC4-amd64-install.img.gz and NetBSD-10.0_RC4-amd64-bios-install.img.gz. The latter is intended for older hardware which is unable to boot using a hybrid MBR and GPT image.
This confirms the thought of bsd-keith https://daemonforums.org/showpost.ph...27&postcount=2
__________________
You don't need to be a genius to debug a pf.conf firewall ruleset, you just need the guts to run tcpdump
Reply With Quote
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Programs dumping core unicyclist OpenBSD Packages and Ports 12 7th September 2018 03:57 PM
Bundle BSD With 3rd Party Programs? Trihex Off-Topic 33 30th August 2017 08:33 AM
problem passing /dev/fd/n to programs TerryP Programming 2 15th April 2009 08:24 AM
Distributed Computing Programs JMJ_coder General software and network 0 25th November 2008 08:50 PM
Programs syrushcw FreeBSD Security 1 2nd May 2008 05:44 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:37 PM.

DaemonForums.org RSS Feeds - Contact Us - DaemonForums.org - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content copyright © 2007-2010, the authors
Daemon image copyright ©1988, Marshall Kirk McKusick